Andreas Haider-Maurer vs Arthur De Greef Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L L W L W L
Form
L W L L L L L W L LHead To Head: Haider-Maurer 1 - 0 Greef
They have played 1 sets in total, with Haider-Maurer winning 1 and Greef winning 0. The last match between Haider-Maurer and Greef was at the Genova Challenger, 02-09-2018, Q1 round, Clay with Andreas Haider-Maurer getting the victory 5-2 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Andreas Haider-Maurer | 1 |
| Arthur De Greef | 0 |
| Haider-Maurer | Stats | Greef |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 47 | Highest Rank | 113 |
| 38 | Age | 33 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 18 | Titles | 12 |
| 57% (447-336) | Career Total W/L | 60% (372-251) |
| $723,565 | Career Prize Money | $140,200 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Haider-Maurer VS Greef H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-2 ret. |
Stats 
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Arthur De Greef
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve %
49%
(
17 of
35)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
31
Total Points Won
24
|
||||
Haider-Maurer VS Greef H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 5 | Games Won | 2 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 0:36:24 | Average Match Time | 0:36:24 |
| 65% (13/20) | 1st Serve % | 49% (17/35) |
| 69% (9/13) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (9/17) |
| 29% (2/7) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (6/18) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 57% (20/35) | Return Points Win % | 45% (9/20) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Andreas Haider-Maurer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
72)
2
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Mikhail Balmashev
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alen Avidzba
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
51%
(
42 of
83)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
4
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
9
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
34 of
39)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Arthur De Greef
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve %
49%
(
17 of
35)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
31
Total Points Won
24
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
48%
(
37 of
77)
4
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
17 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
George Von Massow
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
42%
(
35 of
84)
12
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
29 of
35)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
53 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
12
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
38%
(
18 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
George Von Massow
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
10
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jonathan Kanar
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
4
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
7
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
42%
(
54 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
121)
130
Total Points Won
121
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Arthur De Greef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Arthur De Greef
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Malek Jaziri
Player
Arthur De Greef
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur De Greef
Player
Vit Kopriva
45%
(
23 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Nouza
Player
Arthur De Greef
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tommy Robredo
Player
Arthur De Greef
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Arthur De Greef
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Where To Watch Haider-Maurer vs Greef?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Haider-Maurer Vs Greef is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (447/336) | Win/Loss | 60% (372/251) |
| 55% (1014/820) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (824/595) |
| 52% (9025/8382) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7022/6316) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 2765 | Aces Total | 1099 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1955 | Total Double Faults | 904 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 607.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 600.49 |
| 57% (19661/34263) | 1st Serve % | 58% (14002/24035) |
| 73% (14326/19661) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (9397/14002) |
| 47% (6796/14602) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (4913/10033) |
| 42% (1299/3117) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1047/2493) |
| 38% (12350/32149) | Return Points Win % | 41% (9746/23974) |
| 58% (427/733) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (358/595) |
| 36% (14/39) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 43% (3/7) |
| 49% (130/264) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (110/187) |
| 55% (124/224) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (96/185) |
| 86% (441/380) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (365/319) |
| 14% (441/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (365/46) |
| 20% (342/68) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (258/52) |
See recent tennis photos of Haider-Maurer and Greef
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
